The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.

Although the punishment may very well be severe, its purpose is just not solely to seek vengeance but to discourage potential offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal to your deceased was caused via the petitioner but in support of opinion on the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is available around the file and mere ipsi dixit of police isn't binding within the Court.

Section 302 from the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends within the specifics of each and every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it truly is unclear the way it relates to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based on the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances with the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.

The recent amendment to Section 489-File of the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.

seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is often a mandatory requirement and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation needs that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.

forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a here possibility of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more

In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Even though the couple had two youthful children of their individual at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had youthful children.

Knowledge of your accused can be a matter to be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very difficult for being proved otherwise.”

The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report towards the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which from the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death on the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

                                                        

dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )